Published
The Samsung F7100 series offers a gorgeous design and an impressive features, but "just OK" picture quality makes it a poorer value than its rivals.
- Category
- Tech News
Sign in or sign up to post comments.
Be the first to comment
Up Next
-
13:04
Let's Play Drakengard 3 (JP) - Part 2: Poor Little Dragon
-
05:59
This isn't pretty...Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro - Six Months Later, but it works!
-
01:39
Never Change XCOM - Poor Aiming Makes For Some Hilarious Moments
-
04:06
Galaxy S7 Exynos, Poor iPad sales effects & more - Pocketnow Daily
-
02:05
Samsung's latest security cam is pretty 'meh'
-
03:38
Nokia 9 PureView price tag, Apple's poor sales explained? - Pocketnow Daily
-
07:35
Super Smash Bros. Melee Day 1 - DruggedFox vs. Poor Zhu - Evo 2014
-
10:19
Samsung Galaxy S24 Series Hands-On - Pretty Genius?
-
01:36
OontZ XL: The poor man's Jawbone Big Jambox
-
01:02
Watch Dogs PC Suffering Poor Performance - IGN News
-
10:47
The "Poor Man's Blade" - Gigabyte Aero 14 Review
-
41:49
Ep. 1448: Where rich or poor, it's nice to have money
-
04:06
Call of Duty’s Poor Console Performance & New Xbox Experience Hype! - GS Daily News
-
02:06
Sony SmartWatch 3 has built-in GPS but its poor display doesn't impress
-
00:33
POOR DUCKS ???????????? #shorts #short
-
16:31
GTA Diaries - Stop Being Poor
-
00:14
POV: You go to the F1 but you're poor ????
-
05:35
Super Smash Bros. Melee Day 1 - Enjoiful vs. Poor Zhu - Evo 2014
-
01:06
Samsung's smart washer is a pretty quick study
-
01:21
ViewSonic Pro8200 projector sunk by poor image quality
-
01:51
Poor and rural people could be cut off from fast Internet | Engadget Today
-
04:03
The App Feeding The Poor - BBC Click
Loading...