The scientific establishment has ignored these remarkable artifacts because they contradict the dominant views of human origins and antiquity. It is almost like back-engineering, the way archaeologists take evidence and try to fit it to accepted theory, instead of taking the evidence and trying to craft a theory that encompasses it.
Of course, the 'regular' scientists/archeologists won't like a video like this: it is not what they have learned to believe. But resistence to new visions and ideas is age-old... People who call themselves 'scientist' are very often surprisingly conservative and shortsighted. Instead of finding new challenges in the finding in books like 'Forbidden Archeology', they like to hold on to what was already written down, what they were taught, feeling threatened and afraid that the info they know might be incomplete, or even wrong!
Of course, the 'regular' scientists/archeologists won't like a video like this: it is not what they have learned to believe. But resistence to new visions and ideas is age-old... People who call themselves 'scientist' are very often surprisingly conservative and shortsighted. Instead of finding new challenges in the finding in books like 'Forbidden Archeology', they like to hold on to what was already written down, what they were taught, feeling threatened and afraid that the info they know might be incomplete, or even wrong!
- Category
- Ancient
Sign in or sign up to post comments.
Be the first to comment